![]() |
Tennessee Emergency Communications Association |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
A MESSAGE from our Roane County EC ...
of Roane County ARES
October
Well, it’s the second edition, that’s what it is. And, to date, nobody wants to contribute to it except me. So it could be the last edition – not sure yet. Certainly don’t look for it to be as full as the first unless others want to add their own input. Actually, don’t remember if anybody even said they liked the bloody thing. So maybe it SHOULD go away, eh? BTW, I stole the coax bar separator from the TNECA website. It was just SO much classier than a straight line or arrows! Sorry folks, I just couldn’t help it! So let’s take a look now at the spectrum of things before Roane County ARES for our consideration and action… excelsior!
Alrighty, Now – Let’s be Legal The American Radio Relay League (ARRL) owns the rights to the phrase “Amateur Radio Emergency Service,” “ARES,” and to the ARES logo. I’m not gonna take the time to stick in the cotton-pickin ® symbol every time I type the words, acronym, or insert the logo. Here’s the deal: They say that in all print or electronic publications using these registered marks of the ARRL, we gotta say the marks are owned by ARRL, governed by its rules, and are used by permission. So there. It’s done.
Lots has happened since last issue…We’ve had July 4th boat races, exercises, Gustav and Ike. How much more can you want for an emcomm group? So let’s try to get started. We had two actual emergency operations in April, supporting the EOC for severe weather. 15 man-hours were invested in one operation, of which 13.5 were ARES. The second operation used 11.5 man-hours. There were 2 actual emergency operations in May, one for severe weather, and another for a combination of severe weather and a multi-alarm industrial fire. They involved a total of 10 man-hours. In June there was a 2-day exercise for DOE/NNSA for the Y12 reservation, in which TEMA, DOE, and other state agencies as well as other agencies from multiple agencies played. This involved support for the EOC as well as support in the field. This exercise, as has happened previously in DOE exercises, had some elements that left a lot to be desired. Miscommunication, such as giving information needed and meant for Roane County to Loudon County, happened from DOE. TEMA Area Coordinator(s) were on site observing the exercise. The exercise simulated the release of some radioactive noble gases from the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) due to a coolant problem. Several radiological aspects of the exercise were unrealistic enough to make the scenario no more than a game for those involved. Similarly, TDOT and other decisions about road closings, etc, ignored the wisdom of local input, running tractor trailer rigs over roads that were too narrow, had no shoulders, were curvy, and had only ditches at the sides. This resulted (in simulation) in the total blockage of the detour route, a situation that could have been avoided had the state officials paid heed to or sought info readily available from the counties who knew the roads that TDOT was making decisions about. During these exercises working professionals from different agencies, such as Human Services, Red Cross, law enforcement, Purchasing Department, animal control, EMS, E911 and others were all in the EOC working in their respective ESF functions. The unrealistic nature of the scenario, coupled with the insistence of the controllers on not taking input or situation injections, and the general lack of anything for the ESCs in the EOC to do are the main reason why these busy officials, who are required to come to these exercises, find it impossible to take emergency preparedness exercises seriously. While DOE required participation in these exercises in order to make certain payments to the county, the process seems to be approached from the standpoint of merely going through enough motions in order to put a check-mark in a box and mark off the exercise for the year. This also negates the potential benefit of the exercise, making it very difficult for participants to either learn anything or to take the entire exercise process seriously. I’m not sure there’s anything ARES can do about it, but I think if our and other ARES organizations are careful to file honest and frank AARs, pointing out good as well as bad, at least we will have done our part to make exercises more beneficial for all. An exercise that does not teach something, that is not taken seriously, and is a chore to attend rather than a good learning experience can only provide a check-mark that the exercise as done, and, having done an exercise, it will give a populace a false sense of being more secure “because we exercise.” This is unacceptable.
|
|
|||||||||||
|
help@ccecg.org |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|